View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
| ChPicard
| Joined: 12 Mar 2008 | Posts: 82 | : | Location: Montreal, Canada | Items |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 1:10 am Post subject: How to verify if my 17 given sudokus are not in the Gordon's |
|
|
Hi
Tell me how to verify is these are new?
Thanks
....9.35.81.7......2.........6.43..........81...........32..4.....8.....9........
....9.35.81.7......2.........6.43.......2..81...........3...4.....8.....9........
....9.35.81.7......2.........6.43..........81...........3...4.....8...7.9........ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
| gsf
| Joined: 18 Aug 2005 | Posts: 411 | : | Location: NJ USA | Items |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 1:41 am Post subject: Re: How to verify if my 17 given sudokus are not in the Gord |
|
|
ChPicard wrote: |
Tell me how to verify is these are new?
....9.35.81.7......2.........6.43..........81...........32..4.....8.....9........
....9.35.81.7......2.........6.43.......2..81...........3...4.....8.....9........
....9.35.81.7......2.........6.43..........81...........3...4.....8...7.9........ |
check them at http://people.csse.uwa.edu.au/gordon/sudokuid.php
these 3 are already there |
|
Back to top |
|
|
| ChPicard
| Joined: 12 Mar 2008 | Posts: 82 | : | Location: Montreal, Canada | Items |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 12:01 pm Post subject: Re: How to verify if my 17 given sudokus are not in the Gord |
|
|
gsf wrote: | ChPicard wrote: |
Tell me how to verify is these are new?
....9.35.81.7......2.........6.43..........81...........32..4.....8.....9........
....9.35.81.7......2.........6.43.......2..81...........3...4.....8.....9........
....9.35.81.7......2.........6.43..........81...........3...4.....8...7.9........ |
check them at http://people.csse.uwa.edu.au/gordon/sudokuid.php
these 3 are already there |
Hey Gordon
You are a very ressourceful person.
Thank you
Is your sudocoup still available? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
| ChPicard
| Joined: 12 Mar 2008 | Posts: 82 | : | Location: Montreal, Canada | Items |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 12:02 pm Post subject: Re: How to verify if my 17 given sudokus are not in the Gord |
|
|
gsf wrote: | ChPicard wrote: |
Tell me how to verify is these are new?
....9.35.81.7......2.........6.43..........81...........32..4.....8.....9........
....9.35.81.7......2.........6.43.......2..81...........3...4.....8.....9........
....9.35.81.7......2.........6.43..........81...........3...4.....8...7.9........ |
check them at http://people.csse.uwa.edu.au/gordon/sudokuid.php
these 3 are already there |
Hey Gordon
You are a very ressourceful person.
Thank you
Is it possible to test the 16 given also?
Is your sudocoup still available? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
| gsf
| Joined: 18 Aug 2005 | Posts: 411 | : | Location: NJ USA | Items |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 3:05 pm Post subject: Re: How to verify if my 17 given sudokus are not in the Gord |
|
|
ChPicard wrote: |
Hey Gordon
You are a very ressourceful person.
Thank you
Is it possible to test the 16 given also?
Is your sudocoup still available? |
Gordon Royle is gfroyle on the forums
gsf (me) is a different person
the sudocoup reply (to you) appeared in the software topic on this forum yesterday
I'm sure Gordon has arranged some html fanfare for the first valid 16 clue entry on his identification page
Last edited by gsf on Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:16 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
| gsf
| Joined: 18 Aug 2005 | Posts: 411 | : | Location: NJ USA | Items |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:04 pm Post subject: Re: How to verify if my 17 given sudokus are not in the Gord |
|
|
a new 17 was submitted by Anonymous
that is the name ued when the name field is left blank
fill in that field if you want attribution |
|
Back to top |
|
|
| coloin
| Joined: 05 May 2005 | Posts: 97 | : | | Items |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry that was me, It was from a {-1+1} on number 47718.
I didnt put my name in - I didnt think it would be new !
The fanfare should be worth seeing.
The 17s that I can make are never new - and never from the recently found.
C |
|
Back to top |
|
|
| gsf
| Joined: 18 Aug 2005 | Posts: 411 | : | Location: NJ USA | Items |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
coloin wrote: | Sorry that was me, It was from a {-1+1} on number 47718.
I didnt put my name in - I didnt think it would be new !
The fanfare should be worth seeing.
The 17s that I can make are never new - and never from the recently found.
|
thanks
I've tacked on {-1+1} to my search
so now I'm generating 22s and processing them with
Code: | -go{-2+1}x4{-1+1}x4{-2+1}{-1+1} |
I'm also doing a {-2+2} on my 2008 entries to see if adding {-2+2} instead would be worth the cost |
|
Back to top |
|
|
| coloin
| Joined: 05 May 2005 | Posts: 97 | : | | Items |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How many 22s in the file initially and how long does it take to complete ?
I know Ive said it before, but wouldnt it be quicker [yes] better [dont know] to generate random 18s - with a walking {-2+2} method ?
C |
|
Back to top |
|
|
| gsf
| Joined: 18 Aug 2005 | Posts: 411 | : | Location: NJ USA | Items |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
coloin wrote: | How many 22s in the file initially and how long does it take to complete ?
I know Ive said it before, but wouldnt it be quicker [yes] better [dont know] to generate random 18s - with a walking {-2+2} method ?
|
its fairly easy for my run of the mill generator to produce 22s
{-2+1}x4{-1+1}x4 transforms those to 18s
then (now) the final {-2+1}{-1+1} to check for 17s
I only preserve the 22s (with some 21s and 20s) in files
~43K 22s since 2008-09-06
~5-10 min per 22, longer if it hits a pocket of 17s
I haven't counted the avg # puzzles checked per 22 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
| coloin
| Joined: 05 May 2005 | Posts: 97 | : | | Items |
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks
I indeed generated a hundred or so 21s and from these 17s came out using your program.......[none new]
Interestingly, all the 17s originated from two of the original 21-puzzles. Consequently they were never going to be new.
A variable and presumably less amount of 18s were made from the other 21-puzzles.
A more random selection of 18s will tend to provide a random selection of 17s. This would be what we would want, if we are trying to find the remaining [few] 17-puzzles.
A 17 puzzle should appear every 200 18 puzzles.
Are you not more likely to get a new 17 from 200 random 18s than from 200 18s many of which are linked by a {-1+1}x4 ?
Also, looking at the minimal 18s which you get by doing a {-1+2} on a 17:
Code: | - "common" 17 - eg on that I found from above - eg #25470
.........9.3.............416.....93..4.51........7.....1......5.....2........362.
556 18s associated
- recently found 17 - eg #47724
........1.......23..4.56......7.1.....2...5....78......1......7.8.......3.....9..
63 18s associated |
How to generate "random 18s" ?......im not sure how to avoid the "common" ones.
I suppose if we could just get one 18 from each random 21 or 22 clue puzzle that might be the way, might not be quick enough though.
C |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|